 |
 |
|
Robert Fidgeon - The Herald
Sun
|
'Insider
- The Fearless TV Critic' - The Sunday Herald Sun
|
 |
|
Ross
Warneke - The Age
|
 |
|
Ross
Warneke - The Age
|
 |
|
Robert Fidgeon - The Herald
Sun
|
 |
|
Ross
Warneke - The Age
|
 |
|
'Insider
- The Fearless TV Critic' - The Sunday Herald Sun
|
 |
|
Ross
Warneke - The Age
|
|
"AT
10pm on Saturday, the ABC launches its new
comedy series The Late Show, featuring the D-Generation.
There’s
been no great fanfare about the debut of this one, but Aunty’s
promoting it as a topical, satirical and light-hearted look at the
week’s events.
According
to the publicity handout "as part of the Opposition’s Youth
Training Wage Scheme, cast members will receive $3 a joke".
I
realise Aunty’s a titch cash-strapped right now, but in the
interests of good comedy maybe they could offer $6 if the joke’s
funny."
|
YOUNG
TALENT TIME - R. FIDGEON
Herald-Sun,
July 17, 1992
|
"WELL,
if nothing else, the D-Generation crew have really got everyone
confused over the title of their new Saturday night show on Two. At
the ABC they initially called it The
D-Generation Live. But a somewhat testy management person has been
ringing newspapers and magazines insisting that the real name of the
program is The Late Show – and change your listings promptly
please. Sort yourselves out folks. Then get the D-Gen to sort out
some comedy sketches that more than a studio audience of friends and
relatives will find funny. After the start of a new series by Mel
Smith and Griff Rhys-Jones last weekend, The D-Generation Live
looked dated and insipid. If they cannot do better than this, then
they should stick to radio."
|
INSIDER
Sunday
Herald-Sun, July 26, 1992
|
HERE’S
A LITTLE PIG WITH A CREDIBILITY PROBLEM
"ABC,
in its bounteous wisdom, has quietly slotted in a program called
D-Gen, The Late Show at 10pm on Saturday night with not a word of
publicity, which is a shame, because the one episode I’ve seen was
very funny. I stumbled upon it by pure accident and have since
discovered it’s the D-Generation comedy team starring in a new
series. The episode I saw was the first. I haven’t had the time to
see one since but any attempt at comedy on Saturday night is to be
encouraged. Tony Martin, one of the cast, tells me the show is
produced live, with some segments taped, and has been panned by
Sydney and Melbourne critics. As the opinions which appear in this
column are regularly at odds with those expressed by my southern
colleagues, that surprises me not one little bit. Tony said that as
a New Zealander he was at a loss to understand why Saturday night
television in Australia was so dismal. “In New Zealand, and
everywhere else in the world, Saturday is a huge night on
television,” he said. I’m afraid I don’t have an answer for
you, Tony, but if enough people start turning off sets on Saturday
night maybe someone might get the message."
|
Courier-Mail,
July 31, 1992
|
This
is a transcript of a volley of letters in 'Hit' Magazine from July 2004
between Tony Martin and Stephen Sherrard-Griffith.
|
July
15, 2004
he's just tolkien nonsense
Dear Hit,
Over the past year Leigh Paatsch has copped some criticism for his
film reviews and ratings. I have analysed his reviews for many years
and believe Leigh in most cases to be a great judge on film.
However, some of his ratings and reviews border on complete
disgrace.
Crackerjack was given four stars when released: it was so average
and the humour was recycled. Yet he gave Fellowship of the Ring 2
1/2 stars and The Two Towers, which was revolutionary filmmaking, 3
1/2 stars. Then Mean Girls gets three stars. How can you compare
these films?
The absolutely average teen flick New York Minute received 2 1/2
stars: the same as Fellowship of the Ring. Does Leigh find teen
films more intriguing than the work of Tolkien?
I have written several short films and I'm working on my first
feature in script development. I can't wait for Leigh's review of my
first feature film in a few years.
PS -- Bad Eggs better than The Two Towers? Get real, Leigh!
Stephen Sherrard-Griffith, Murrumbeena
knocked
back
|
Dear
Hit,
Embittered filmmaker Stephen Sherrard-Griffith states (Hit, July 15)
that my friend Mick Molloy's film Crackerjack is undeserving of
praise because its humour is "recycled", but provides not
a single example to support his allegation.
In fact, Crackerjack is not only an original work, but the most
popular and successful Australian film of the past two years.
Sherrard-Griffith then narcissistically envisions a time when his
own (as yet unwritten) feature film will be humbly submitted for
critical approbation.
One can only hope that this proposed masterwork will be less
derivative than his short film Fartknocker, whose title Beavis and
Butthead fans will recognise as a prime example of "recycled
humour".
Tony Martin, Stonnington
|
|
Dear
Hit,
The rankled Tony Martin (Hit, July 22) missed the point.
Crackerjack was fun, but the plot wasn't exactly intriguing, was it?
It had recycled Hot Shots humour (Mick Molloy as Saddam Hussein),
over-used actors and too many old-people jokes.
I grew up a huge fan of Martin/Molloy. Two talented people. Yet
Martin attacks me because I know the Lord Of The Rings films
deserved greater review stars than Crackerjack and Bad Eggs.
This is not to say they are not popular films; they are just not in
the same league as LOTR.
Fartknocker, my short film (which Martin has not seen), just won the
Shortswood Film Festival's Judge's Choice Award and was selected to
the Top 80 films for Tropfest 2003.
The ironic thing is that Martin has actually heard of Fartknocker.
Who has heard/remembers Bad Eggs?
My argument was with poor reviews. If Tony wants to play it as an
attack, then I ask him: Beavis & Butthead made more than $250
million. Did Bad Eggs even make its catering expenses back from
box-office ticket sales?
Martin, acting like a spoilt celebrity, has made a career taking the
piss out of others and has recycled Bargearse jokes for long enough.
He is not exactly making his own masterworks.
Stephen Sherrard-Griffith,
Murrumbeena
|
|
Dear
Hit,
Stephen Sherrard-Griffith had an entire week to back up his
allegation of plagiarism in Crackerjack and the best he could come
up with is that Mick Molloy, in a fancy-dress ball sequence, dresses
as Saddam Hussein, a character who had been portrayed in Hot Shots
2. Anyone who has seen both films will recognise this as possibly
the longest bow ever drawn.
Sherrard-Griffith also says that I have "not seen" his
film Fartknocker. Sadly, I was present at a Popcorn Taxi screening,
where it was presented as a film that wasn't good enough to get into
Tropfest, if you can imagine such a thing.
Having endured this dismal short, I would suggest this won't be the
last time Sherrard-Griffith will have to grapple with the concept of
someone not having seen one of his films.
Tony Martin, Stonnington
|
|
Dear
Hit,
Tony Martin makes me laugh confusing his Bad Eggs' failure and my
Fartknocker's success. Take a leaf from Rob Sitch's book: make films
with heart and soul such as The Dish instead of puerile crap like
Bad Eggs.
I don't waste a week thinking about Tony as I have films to make. He
is the Robin Hood of "pulling the longest bow" and
shooting himself.
Stephen Sherrard-Griffith, Murrumbeena
extraordinary
commitment
|
Dear
Hit,
Stephen Sherrard-Griffith accuses Tony Martin of "acting like a
spoilt celebrity" for sticking up for his mate Mick Molloy's
Crackerjack.
It takes a special brand of delusional pride to seriously compare
making one short film with writing, producing, and directing a
feature film. It takes years off your life.
I'm sure that Sherrard-Griffith's Fartknocker has merit, but I doubt
that it stacks up against Tony Martin's extraordinary commitment and
contribution to Australian comedy over the past 15 years.
Sherrard-Griffith would do well to show some respect and humility,
and refrain from publicly blowing his comparatively minuscule
trumpet.
Fiona Scott-Norman, East St Kilda
|
|
This debate is now officially closed -- Ed
|
|