Robert Fidgeon - The Herald Sun

 

'Insider - The Fearless TV Critic' - The Sunday Herald Sun

 

Ross Warneke - The Age

 

Ross Warneke - The Age

 

Robert Fidgeon - The Herald Sun

 

Ross Warneke - The Age

 

'Insider - The Fearless TV Critic' - The Sunday Herald Sun

 

Ross Warneke - The Age

 

"AT 10pm on Saturday, the ABC launches its new comedy series The Late Show, featuring the D-Generation.

There’s been no great fanfare about the debut of this one, but Aunty’s promoting it as a topical, satirical and light-hearted look at the week’s events.

According to the publicity handout "as part of the Opposition’s Youth Training Wage Scheme, cast members will receive $3 a joke".

I realise Aunty’s a titch cash-strapped right now, but in the interests of good comedy maybe they could offer $6 if the joke’s funny."

YOUNG TALENT TIME - R. FIDGEON
Herald-Sun, July 17, 1992

 

"WELL, if nothing else, the D-Generation crew have really got everyone confused over the title of their new Saturday night show on Two. At the ABC they initially called it The D-Generation Live. But a somewhat testy management person has been ringing newspapers and magazines insisting that the real name of the program is The Late Show – and change your listings promptly please. Sort yourselves out folks. Then get the D-Gen to sort out some comedy sketches that more than a studio audience of friends and relatives will find funny. After the start of a new series by Mel Smith and Griff Rhys-Jones last weekend, The D-Generation Live looked dated and insipid. If they cannot do better than this, then they should stick to radio."

 

INSIDER
Sunday Herald-Sun, July 26, 1992

 

HERE’S A LITTLE PIG WITH A CREDIBILITY PROBLEM

"ABC, in its bounteous wisdom, has quietly slotted in a program called D-Gen, The Late Show at 10pm on Saturday night with not a word of publicity, which is a shame, because the one episode I’ve seen was very funny. I stumbled upon it by pure accident and have since discovered it’s the D-Generation comedy team starring in a new series. The episode I saw was the first. I haven’t had the time to see one since but any attempt at comedy on Saturday night is to be encouraged. Tony Martin, one of the cast, tells me the show is produced live, with some segments taped, and has been panned by Sydney and Melbourne critics. As the opinions which appear in this column are regularly at odds with those expressed by my southern colleagues, that surprises me not one little bit. Tony said that as a New Zealander he was at a loss to understand why Saturday night television in Australia was so dismal. “In New Zealand, and everywhere else in the world, Saturday is a huge night on television,” he said. I’m afraid I don’t have an answer for you, Tony, but if enough people start turning off sets on Saturday night maybe someone might get the message."

Courier-Mail, July 31, 1992

 

 
 

This is a transcript of a volley of letters in 'Hit' Magazine from July 2004 between Tony Martin and Stephen Sherrard-Griffith.

 


July 15, 2004

he's just tolkien nonsense

Dear Hit,

Over the past year Leigh Paatsch has copped some criticism for his film reviews and ratings. I have analysed his reviews for many years and believe Leigh in most cases to be a great judge on film. However, some of his ratings and reviews border on complete disgrace.

Crackerjack was given four stars when released: it was so average and the humour was recycled. Yet he gave Fellowship of the Ring 2 1/2 stars and The Two Towers, which was revolutionary filmmaking, 3 1/2 stars. Then Mean Girls gets three stars. How can you compare these films?

The absolutely average teen flick New York Minute received 2 1/2 stars: the same as Fellowship of the Ring. Does Leigh find teen films more intriguing than the work of Tolkien?

I have written several short films and I'm working on my first feature in script development. I can't wait for Leigh's review of my first feature film in a few years.

PS -- Bad Eggs better than The Two Towers? Get real, Leigh!

Stephen Sherrard-Griffith, Murrumbeena

knocked back

 

 

 


Dear Hit,

Embittered filmmaker Stephen Sherrard-Griffith states (Hit, July 15) that my friend Mick Molloy's film Crackerjack is undeserving of praise because its humour is "recycled", but provides not a single example to support his allegation.

In fact, Crackerjack is not only an original work, but the most popular and successful Australian film of the past two years.

Sherrard-Griffith then narcissistically envisions a time when his own (as yet unwritten) feature film will be humbly submitted for critical approbation.

One can only hope that this proposed masterwork will be less derivative than his short film Fartknocker, whose title Beavis and Butthead fans will recognise as a prime example of "recycled humour".

Tony Martin, Stonnington

 

 


Dear Hit,

The rankled Tony Martin (Hit, July 22) missed the point.

Crackerjack was fun, but the plot wasn't exactly intriguing, was it? It had recycled Hot Shots humour (Mick Molloy as Saddam Hussein), over-used actors and too many old-people jokes.

I grew up a huge fan of Martin/Molloy. Two talented people. Yet Martin attacks me because I know the Lord Of The Rings films deserved greater review stars than Crackerjack and Bad Eggs.

This is not to say they are not popular films; they are just not in the same league as LOTR.

Fartknocker, my short film (which Martin has not seen), just won the Shortswood Film Festival's Judge's Choice Award and was selected to the Top 80 films for Tropfest 2003.

The ironic thing is that Martin has actually heard of Fartknocker. Who has heard/remembers Bad Eggs?

My argument was with poor reviews. If Tony wants to play it as an attack, then I ask him: Beavis & Butthead made more than $250 million. Did Bad Eggs even make its catering expenses back from box-office ticket sales?

Martin, acting like a spoilt celebrity, has made a career taking the piss out of others and has recycled Bargearse jokes for long enough. He is not exactly making his own masterworks.

Stephen Sherrard-Griffith,

Murrumbeena

 

 


Dear Hit,

Stephen Sherrard-Griffith had an entire week to back up his allegation of plagiarism in Crackerjack and the best he could come up with is that Mick Molloy, in a fancy-dress ball sequence, dresses as Saddam Hussein, a character who had been portrayed in Hot Shots 2. Anyone who has seen both films will recognise this as possibly the longest bow ever drawn.

Sherrard-Griffith also says that I have "not seen" his film Fartknocker. Sadly, I was present at a Popcorn Taxi screening, where it was presented as a film that wasn't good enough to get into Tropfest, if you can imagine such a thing.

Having endured this dismal short, I would suggest this won't be the last time Sherrard-Griffith will have to grapple with the concept of someone not having seen one of his films.

Tony Martin, Stonnington

 

 


Dear Hit,

Tony Martin makes me laugh confusing his Bad Eggs' failure and my Fartknocker's success. Take a leaf from Rob Sitch's book: make films with heart and soul such as The Dish instead of puerile crap like Bad Eggs.

I don't waste a week thinking about Tony as I have films to make. He is the Robin Hood of "pulling the longest bow" and shooting himself.

Stephen Sherrard-Griffith, Murrumbeena

extraordinary commitment

 

 


Dear Hit,

Stephen Sherrard-Griffith accuses Tony Martin of "acting like a spoilt celebrity" for sticking up for his mate Mick Molloy's Crackerjack.

It takes a special brand of delusional pride to seriously compare making one short film with writing, producing, and directing a feature film. It takes years off your life.

I'm sure that Sherrard-Griffith's Fartknocker has merit, but I doubt that it stacks up against Tony Martin's extraordinary commitment and contribution to Australian comedy over the past 15 years.

Sherrard-Griffith would do well to show some respect and humility, and refrain from publicly blowing his comparatively minuscule trumpet.

Fiona Scott-Norman, East St Kilda

 

This debate is now officially closed -- Ed